Joseph, S. J. (~ 2013). Was Daniel 7.13’s "Son of Man" modeled after the "New Adam" of the "Animal Apocalypse" ("1 Enoch" 90)? : A comparative study [Electronic]. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, 22,4 (2013) 269-294, ,4 (2013) 269-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951820713491679
Chicago Manual of Style 17th edition (author-date)Joseph, Simon J. 2013. "Was Daniel 7.13’s "Son of Man" modeled after the "New Adam" of the ’Animal Apocalypse’ (’1 Enoch’ 90)? : A comparative study". Electronic. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, מס’ 22,4 (2013) 269-294: ,4 (2013) 269-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951820713491679.
Springer - Basic (author-date)Joseph SJ (2013) Was Daniel 7.13’s "Son of Man" modeled after the "New Adam" of the "Animal Apocalypse" ("1 Enoch" 90)? : A comparative study. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha ,4 (2013) 269-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951820713491679
Springer - Lecture Notes in Computer Science1.Joseph, S.J.: Was Daniel 7.13’s "Son of Man" modeled after the "New Adam" of the "Animal Apocalypse" ("1 Enoch" 90)? : A comparative study. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha. ,4 (2013) 269-294 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0951820713491679.
DIN 1505-2 (author-date, Deutsch) - standard superseded by ISO-690Joseph, Simon J.: Was Daniel 7.13’s "Son of Man" modeled after the "New Adam" of the "Animal Apocalypse" ("1 Enoch" 90)? : A comparative study. בתוך: Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha (2013), Nr. 22,4 (2013) 269-294, ’עמ ,4 (2013) 269-294